| Fish Tank Clan :: Forums :: General Forums :: Schooling Fish |
|
« Previous topic | Next topic » |
| Vote Ron Paul in 2008 you mother fuckers | ||
| Author | Post | ||
| [FT](.)(.)'s a |
|
||
[FT](.)(.)\\\\(.)'s a](/media/avatar/100x0/upload/css_spray.1189739279.jpg)
Registered Member #355
Joined: Sun Jul 23 2006, 06:38AMPosts: 244 |
ron paul ftl he sounds and makes the same statements that bush made b4 he was president. here goes a old bush speech b4 he was president listen to how he sounds and says the same statements that ron paul makes. -[link]- personally none of these clowns seem good enough for president. My vote is for a independent but no one is running as that. my vote = banana with lube as vice president | ||
| Back to top |
|
||
| Knightrider |
|
||
Meteor 2016
Registered Member #316
Joined: Mon Jun 26 2006, 09:14PMPosts: 3503 |
NoSkill wrote ... KnightrideR wrote ... I don't vote because it doesn't make a difference. It's because of people like you Dubya got elected. It does make a difference, after this past presidency I think you'll find a record voter turnout in November. What happens when people don't care about their government? The Patriot Act and Iraq, fuck that. Fuck you for not caring. Fuck any war that wasn't voted on by congress (you know... like it says in that little piece of paper called the constitution). And fuck federal policy based on religious beliefs. End rant. I didn't vote for him, nor have I ever supported him. I don't support any of the dickheads that run for president because I hate politics. It's dickheads like you that irk me to no end. I'm against the war, and I'm against the president. So know the details before you throw your fucking assumptions in my face. I choose not to vote because I hate politics. Oh, and I can vote. I'm 19 years old twat. |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| NoSkill |
|
||
Sir
Registered Member #457
Joined: Tue Oct 10 2006, 01:13PMPosts: 2628 |
Oh you're against war? Oh you're against Dubya? But yet, you didn't vote for any of the "dickheads", so basically you have NO influence on ANYTHING. Yet still thanks to this beautiful country you have the right to bitch. You may want to get more involved until some "dickhead" comes along and makes the right to bitch only applicable to people with licenses. Besides my rant wasn't aimed at you, it was aimed at people who don't vote, don't take it so FUCKING personally. Notice the intro "it's because of people LIKE you that Dubya got elected." I never said you voted for him, or that you supported him. All I said was voting does make a difference. Unfortunately not enough people do it, otherwise it'd make all the difference in the world. |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| BuBBLe GooSe |
|
||
The Original MilfHunter
Registered Member #163
Joined: Mon Mar 06 2006, 02:24PMPosts: 1592 |
Ron Paul FUCKING rocks! I've been a fan of his for a while now, and he tells it like it is. He's a Libertarian running as a Republican, but sadly he said that he wouldn't run as an Independent should he lose the Republican nomination.  (Results from the Iowa caucus show a great deal of support for Huckabee and Romney. )He FUCKING rocks because: - He is a real Texan. (Not like the current douche in the Oval Office who is actually from Connecticut, but can fool people into thinking he's from Texas because he has a ranch and wears a stupid looking hat.) - He is opposed to the formation of the NAU (North American Union), and he objects the plans for a North American currency (The Amero). - He is against the construction of a 12 lane transcontinental superhighway that would run from Mexico, through the US and into Canada. -[link]- - He wants to pull the US out of the United Nations because he recognizes that One World Government would mean global enslavement and the UN would act as the governing body. He is for free trade, but doesn't think that NAFTA and the WTO is the way to go because it sacrifices a nation's autonomy. - He recognizes that Federal Income Taxes are unaportioned taxes and therefore unconstitutional. He also agrees with the Supreme Court when they decreed that the 16th Amendment did not create any new laws and he agrees that there are no laws on the books that require Americans to pay Federal Income Tax. -[link]- - He is opposed to the Federal Reserve and the privately owned Central banking Cartels that loan the US money (derived out of thin air), and charge interest on it. He wants the US to print its own currency. - He has a very strong stance on illegal immigration. He feels the benefits of being an illegal alien should be eliminated. - He upholds the Constitution and feels that more checks and balances should be put in place with regards to the Executive branch of government so as to curb the temptation of tyranny and dictatorship. - He wants to see a new, unbiased investigation into the events of 9/11. I've seen many documentaries where he was interviewed or where he made cameos and he has always been very upfront. The info on his site is a bit watered down, but still relatively stern compared to the true neo-cons (Rs AND Ds alike). He is the only candidate running for the Office of Commander-in-Chief, the other assclowns are running for Chief Executive Officer of 'America the Corporation'. He wants to restore power to the people and has gained a strong following among the younger generation of informed voters. _______________________________________________ Oth er popular assclowns in the running: Obama and Clinton Both are members of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR's mission is to progress the vision of a New World Order (One World Government.) The term 'New World Order' is closely linked to George H.W. Bush and the first time he used the term was during a speech to Congress on... SEPTEMBER 11, 1991. I shit you not. (Possibly the greatest 2 mins you will ever spend, unless you blow fast.  ) -[link]- A former director of the CFR was none other than Dick Cheney and notorious globalist David Rokefeller has been behind many NWO organizations. -[link]- ______________________________________________ European Union and its relation to the North American Union and One World Government From Wiki: EU = A political and economic community of twenty-seven member states with supranational and intergovernmental features, located primarily in Europe... It is intended to come into force on 1 January 2009. The EU creates a single market by a system of laws which apply in all member states, guaranteeing the freedom of movement of people, goods, services and capital. It maintains a common trade policy, agricultural and fisheries policies, and a regional development policy. In 1999 the EU introduced a common currency, the euro, which has been adopted by fifteen member states. It has also developed a role in foreign policy, and in justice and home affairs. Passport control between many member states has been abolished under the Schengen Agreement. -In other words, 27 European countries have merged into one big country. EU Constitution: Formally, the approval of the treaty would have led to the adoption of a new rule-book, explicitly called a Constitution, for the European Union, but this new Constitution would not have replaced national Constitutions. However, as already prepared by a number of precedent treaties, the provisions made by the TCE would superate national law, thus leading individual countries to put their national Constitution in congruence with the TCE. -When you create a new country, you create a supreme law that oversees all other 'lesser' laws within it. I remember hearing that a member of the British House of Lords say that the EU Constitution would render approx 85% of the current British constitution inoperable because it would have to conform to the new EU law. The EU took steps to get where its at. Free trade agreements similar to NAFTA seem harmless at first, right? The Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP .gov) between Canada, US and Mexico take trade one step further and it integrates economy, pandemic management, energy supply, emergency management and securing borders (NA continental border) as well as a whole variety of other areas which sovereign governments used to take care of for themselves. A unified currency (the Amero) is on its way and anyone familiar with the markets knows that the Canadian and US dollars have been worth the same value for a few months now. Freedom of movement is easily facilitated by the 12 lane superhighway. We are well on our way to the NAU. Now with a few of these superstates, it becomes easier to then combine them into a single, one world government. Ron Paul is strongly opposed to this... __________________________________________ NoSkill wrote ... All I said was voting does make a difference. Unfortunately not enough people do it, otherwise it'd make all the difference in the world. Semi-fail. It pains me to say it, but what guarantee is there that votes are counted and the results are legit? This move to electronic voting and eliminating the paper ballots (paper ballot = a reciept of how someone voted and can be checked if a need arose [FL],) means that the results of a vote can be changed to suit a desired outcome. Here's a brief Youtube vid of a computer programmer who stood up before a Congressional hearing, and under oath, admitted to being ordered by his boss (Tom Feeney (R), then Speaker of the House in Florida) to write an undetectable software program that would rig the outcome of an election. In his professional opinion, he said that the Ohio vote in '04 was tampered... -[link]- This 5 min vid is a must. Edited Fri Jan 04 2008, 10:15PM |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| Amped |
|
||
Hi
Registered Member #301
Joined: Thu Jun 15 2006, 01:55AMPosts: 888 |
If I had to vote for a Republican candidate, it might be Ron Paul. But don't have to, so I won't. I do support a lot of his planks, including his stance on the war, constitutional rights, etc. However, I hate his views on the economy, abortion, and stem cell research. The latter two I flat-out support. In terms of economy, he wants to eliminate the deficit budget by getting rid of tons of government programs and agencies. Sure, it might be nice not to have an Income Tax. But guess what: Our government and economy run on a deficit budget. You know what else? Inflation is normal, and US inflation at this point isn't terrible. And he wants to get rid of the Federal Reserve? Good luck with that. No more monetary policy to save our asses, so when we get ourselves into a jam, politicians who knows nothing about the economy and everything about getting themselves re-elected can take months to vote on dumb fiscal policy that does absolutely nothing. Nothx. |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| OneLove1252 |
|
||
Registered Member #927
Joined: Mon Dec 03 2007, 01:25AMPosts: 533 |
i live in texas, i have to vote republican, its the law | ||
| Back to top |
|
||
| Teh Bunneh |
|
||
Registered Member #918
Joined: Sat Nov 17 2007, 08:15PMPosts: 47 |
Ahh.. Ron Paul, don't realyl care, but as long as it isn't Hillary, if Hillary gets in.. /wrists, she will get assiassinated no doubt if she gets in, im rooting for Obama or Edwards TBH. | ||
| Back to top |
|
||
| b4ndito |
|
||
b4ndito
Registered Member #958
Joined: Fri Jan 04 2008, 06:59AMPosts: 3385 |
Wow, it's just an election. Be a real American and just support whoever gets nominated for the party you believe in, regardless of the candidate's personal beliefs. That's how a two-party system works, duh. Bush is fucking up, so is the Democratic Congress. Hillary is a liar, socialist, and to top it off, a heinous bitch. Obama will not get elected, because drug abuse isn't a particularly progressive platform that most Americans want to see in their leader. Guilliani, who most think is a great moderate candidate, is a great leader (As we saw in NYC after 9/11), but his belief core doesn't hold up to what America needs right now either. I'm a moderate, so everyone thinks I'm a craven pussy who can't make a decision. However, that is only partially true. I vote based on who I think has the best platforms to help America. Right now, I think it's a Conservative candidate. Illegal Immigration needs to end, pot needs to remain unlawful, and the dollar needs to regain its value. We can't just LEAVE the fiasco that is the War in Iraq in our past. For the record, there are/were WMD's in Iraq. Reagan sold them to Saddam in 1980 to aid in their war against Iran. While at the time, this helped end the brutal satellite wars of the greater Cold War, it eventually led to a crippling fear of the Middle Eastern countries and their power to subvert American dominance. Congress did unanimously vote for the War in Iraq, including Sen. Clinton. I want a conservative candidate...just not Mitt Romney. Feel free to debate, but don't get pissed at me, for I won't respond. See ya in November. (On a side note, my douchebag brother managed to vote for Bush twice. The jackass.) |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| Zero |
|
||
I want to fuck your hand.
Registered Member #571
Joined: Thu Feb 15 2007, 09:59PMPosts: 2809 |
b4ndito wrote ... Guilliani, who most think is a great moderate candidate, is a great leader (As we saw in NYC after 9/11), but his belief core doesn't hold up to what America needs right now either. Its assumptions like this that piss me off. To be honest, I really want to hear Amish's Point of view on the topic, because If I had a reaction to what you just said, im sure he'll fucking kill you. |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| [FT](.)(.)'s a |
|
||
|
[FT](.)(.)\\\\
Registered Member #355
Joined: Sun Jul 23 2006, 06:38AM Posts: 244 |
Guilliani should of did a better job before 9/11. After 9/11 didn't do any good for anyone. | ||
| Back to top |
|
||
Powered by e107 Forum System
|
|